Skip to main content

American Indian Human sacrifice

 Yes, there is archaeological evidence of human sacrifice (including retainer sacrifices accompanying elite burials) among ancient Native American cultures in what is now United States territory, particularly in the Mississippian culture (ca. 800–1600 CE). This differs markedly from the large-scale, institutionalized practices seen in Mesoamerican civilizations like the Aztecs, which often involved heart extraction or decapitation on a massive scale to sustain the cosmos.Evidence from Cahokia (Mississippian Culture)The strongest and most well-documented case comes from Cahokia, a major Mississippian site near modern-day St. Louis, Illinois (peaking around 1050–1200 CE).Excavations of Mound 72 revealed over 270 burials, with scholars estimating that about 62% (around 170 individuals) were sacrificial victims.

These included mass graves of young women (e.g., 53 females aged 18–23 buried together on litters, likely strangled or poisoned) and groups of men (some headless or showing signs of blunt force trauma).

The sacrifices appear tied to the death of high-status individuals (e.g., a elite male buried on a bed of 20,000 shell beads in a bird-shaped arrangement), suggesting retainer sacrifice—killing attendants or captives to accompany rulers in the afterlife.

This practice has parallels in historic accounts of the Natchez (a later Mississippian-descended group), where retainers were strangled upon a chief's death.

Similar retainer sacrifices and ritual killings have been noted at other Mississippian sites, though on a smaller scale.Other RegionsIn the Ancestral Puebloan (Anasazi) culture of the Southwest US (e.g., sites in Colorado like Cowboy Wash, ca. 1150–1175 CE), there is evidence of extreme violence, dismemberment, and possible cannibalism in some assemblages of human remains.

However, this is heavily debated—interpretations range from ritual violence or warfare to survival cannibalism during famine, or even accusations of witchcraft rather than formalized sacrifice.

No clear evidence of systematic human sacrifice (especially of children from subdued groups) exists here.

Isolated or ritual killings may have occurred in other regions (e.g., among some Plains groups like the Pawnee's historic Morning Star ceremony, involving captive sacrifice), but these are rare and not comparable to Mesoamerican scales.

Overall, while human sacrifice occurred in ancient cultures within modern US borders—most convincingly as retainer burials in the Mississippian period—it was not widespread, institutionalized, or frequently involving children from conquered tribes as described for the Aztecs. The practices appear more limited to elite funerals or specific rituals, and evidence for child sacrifice specifically in this context is lacking. Archaeological interpretations emphasize that these were complex societies with varied beliefs, not defined solely by violence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...
Post a Comment
Read more

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...
Post a Comment
Read more

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...
Post a Comment
Read more