Skip to main content

Steve Bannon anti Israel now?

 Steve Bannon's public positioning on Israel has indeed shifted dramatically in tone and intensity over the past couple of years, evolving from a vocal "Zionist" advocate during the Trump era to a fierce critic of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. However, this isn't quite a blanket "anti-Israel" flip—it's more precisely a targeted "America First" backlash against what Bannon sees as Netanyahu's manipulation of U.S. policy, endless aid demands, and efforts to entangle America in Middle East wars (especially with Iran). He still frames himself as pro-Israel in the abstract, but his rhetoric has veered into outright calls for "regime change" in Jerusalem, accusations of Israeli lies, and even suggestions for a "Christian state" in the Holy Land. This has drawn accusations of antisemitism from Jewish groups like the ADL and Forward, who point to his history of platforming white nationalists and recent gestures (like a straight-armed salute at CPAC in early 2025 that echoed a Nazi Sieg Heil). Below, I'll break down the evolution, key triggers, and evidence.Bannon's Earlier Pro-Israel Stance (2016–2023)During Trump's first term and the early post-presidency years, Bannon was a staunch Israel hawk, aligning with the administration's moves like recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the Golan Heights annexation, and the Abraham Accords. He ran Breitbart News (2012–2016), which published relentlessly pro-Israel content while attacking critics as antisemites—earning him praise from groups like the Zionist Organization of America as "the opposite of an anti-Semite." Bannon himself declared in 2016 interviews that he was a "Zionist" and saw Israel as a frontline ally against radical Islam.Even in late 2023, amid the October 7 Hamas attacks, Bannon supported Israel aid—but with caveats. On his War Room podcast, he argued for sending money to Israel only after securing the U.S. southern border, posting on Gettr: "No Money for Ukraine, No Money for Israel. UNTIL we STOP the Invasion of America." This was classic Bannon: pro-Israel but subordinate to domestic "America First" priorities.The Shift: From Ally to Adversary (2024–2025)The "light switch" moment appears to have flipped around mid-2024, accelerating after Trump's 2024 reelection and into 2025, as Bannon's MAGA isolationism clashed with Netanyahu's push for deeper U.S. involvement in Israel's conflicts. What started as grumbling about aid and "neocon" warmongers (e.g., Fox News hosts like Mark Levin, whom he dubbed "Tel Aviv Levin") escalated into full-throated attacks. By early 2025, Bannon was accusing Israel of being a "U.S. protectorate" rather than a true ally—one that "never fought shoulder to shoulder with us" but drags America into "messes like in Iran." He's repeatedly called Netanyahu a "pathological liar" who gives "bad information" to trap the U.S. in wars.Key escalations:February 2025: In a podcast interview, Bannon declared American Jews who don't back Trump/MAGA as "the main enemy" of Israel, echoing old antisemitic tropes about "disloyal" Jews. He blamed progressive Jewish donors (e.g., George Soros) for undermining Israel by funding Democrats, while praising evangelical Christians as Israel's true allies. This drew widespread backlash, including from Haaretz, which called it a "toxic take" dividing Diaspora Jews from Israelis.

March 2025: At an Orthodox pro-MAGA dinner, Bannon accepted a "Warrior for Israel" award but railed against groups like AIPAC for lobbying U.S. aid amid America's "debt crisis," saying they "fuel the fire" for anti-Israel sentiment. Days earlier, he'd done the controversial arm gesture, which he dismissed as critics being "unreasonable."

June–September 2025: During a brief U.S.-backed Israeli-Iran skirmish (the "12-day war"), Bannon exploded, saying Israel "ran out" of options without U.S. troops and accusing Netanyahu of faking intel for "regime change" in Tehran. He demanded a congressional probe into whether Fox News was "dealing directly with foreign intelligence services" (implying Mossad). By September, he flatly stated: "Israel is not an ally of the United States. They're a protectorate."

October 2025: The peak of vitriol. Bannon called for Netanyahu's immediate ouster—"We need regime change in Jerusalem and we need it tonight"—claiming his "Greater Israel" vision (annexing West Bank/Gaza) had "blown up in his face" under Trump's restraint. In a heated clash with Trump ally Laura Loomer, he insisted Netanyahu's government was "atrocious" and worse than the Muslim Brotherhood. He even floated a "3-state solution": Jewish Israel, Palestinian state, and a new "Christian state of Jerusalem" in the Holy Land.

On X (formerly Twitter), this plays out in real-time: Recent posts from accounts like @ShadowofEzra

 and @RT_com

 amplify Bannon clips where he warns Americans to support Israel "with your own money and your own time" if they prioritize it over U.S. interests. Semantic searches show a flood of 2025 posts labeling him an "antisemite" for the flip, with users noting he "went from big supporter to suddenly antisemite."What Triggered the Change?No single "light switch" event, but a confluence:MAGA Isolationism vs. Neocon Hawks: Post-2024 election, Trump's team (including Bannon) prioritized ending "forever wars." Netanyahu's pleas for U.S. strikes on Iran clashed with this, exposing rifts in MAGA (e.g., Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk echo Bannon's anti-interventionism).

Personal/Strategic Grift: Critics on Reddit and X call Bannon a "grifter" chasing far-right audiences increasingly skeptical of Israel aid amid U.S. economic woes. His old Breitbart ties to white nationalists (who often blend philosemitism with anti-Jewish conspiracy) resurface, amplified by his attacks on "globalist" Jews.

Netanyahu's Overreach: Bannon claims intel from Trump's circle shows Netanyahu lied about threats to provoke U.S. action, eroding trust. A Haaretz piece notes Bannon's "scathing" vassal-state rhetoric resonates with MAGA base fatigue over $3B+ annual Israel aid.

Broader Far-Right Trends: As one Reddit thread puts it, "It's more popular among the far right to hate Jews and Israel than Muslims... so he's switched to grifting that opinion." This aligns with rising Christian nationalism in MAGA, where Bannon's "Christian state" idea fits.

Bannon still insists he's "one of the most pro-Israel people out there," but his actions—demanding CIA probes into "Mossad talking points," mocking Rubio's yarmulke, and platforming anti-Zionist guests—undermine that. It's less a rejection of Israel than a purge of its current leadership from the "America First" tent, laced with enough red flags to fuel the antisemitism charges. If Trump reins in aid or pushes a Gaza deal, expect Bannon to claim victory; otherwise, this feud could fracture MAGA further.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...