Skip to main content

Trump's plane in Sights?

 OverviewOn October 17, 2025, U.S. Secret Service agents discovered a suspicious elevated hunting stand (also described as a tree platform or deer blind) in a wooded area near Palm Beach International Airport (PBIA) in Florida. The structure had a direct line of sight to the spot where President Donald Trump typically exits Air Force One during his frequent visits to nearby Mar-a-Lago. The FBI is leading an ongoing investigation into whether it poses a security threat, but no individuals have been linked to it, and no arrests have been made. The discovery occurred during routine advance sweeps ahead of Trump's arrival that evening, and it did not disrupt his schedule.This incident follows heightened security concerns after previous assassination attempts on Trump, including the September 2024 golf course plot by Ryan Routh (convicted last month) at a nearby West Palm Beach site. Authorities emphasize that layered security measures prevented any risk, and Trump departed PBIA on October 19 using alternative, shorter stairs on Air Force One as a precaution.Key DetailsLocation and Setup: The stand was found across Southern Boulevard (a highway) from the airport, in a tree line over 200 yards away. It appeared weathered, suggesting it had been in place for months—possibly predating Trump's use of that exact airport section, which was under construction recently.

cbsnews.com +2

Discovery Timeline: Found on Thursday, October 17, during pre-arrival preparations. A portion of Southern Boulevard was briefly closed (reopened by October 19 evening) for evidence collection. FBI personnel were flown in to process the site, including analysis of nearby cell phone data.

usatoday.com +2

Security Response: No one was present at the site. Trump arrived via the standard route on October 17 and attended events, including golf at Trump International Golf Club on October 18. On departure (October 19), he used the plane's retractable belly stairs for quicker boarding, citing "increased security measures."

washingtonexaminer.com +2

Investigation Status: FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed the probe on October 19, stating it "has not yet been connected to any individual." The Secret Service described it as "items of interest" without specifying intent. It's unclear if the stand was equipped with weapons or surveillance gear, but its elevated position raised sniper concerns.

cbsnews.com +2

Aspect

Details

Sources

Potential Threat Level

Elevated due to sightline; could serve as a sniper perch, but no evidence of use. Similar to 2024 golf course attempt ~5 miles away.

CBS News , NBC News , Fox News

Official Statements

Secret Service: "No impact to movements; underscores layered security." FBI: Analyzing evidence, no suspects.

USA Today , Independent

Public Reaction

Widespread concern on X, linking to prior attempts; calls to "protect Trump." Some speculate foreign/domestic ties, but unverified.

X posts [post:17], [post:21], [post:51]

Broader ContextThis adds to a pattern of threats against Trump, including two 2024 attempts (Pennsylvania rally and Florida golf course). Older rumors (e.g., September 2024 claims of smuggled missiles targeting his plane) remain unsubstantiated and unrelated.

The Secret Service has not commented on connections to ongoing protests or foreign actors. Updates are expected as the FBI processes forensics; for now, it's treated as precautionary vigilance rather than an active plot.If more details emerge (e.g., via FBI briefings), I'll keep an eye out—let me know if you'd like me to monitor specific angles!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...
Post a Comment
Read more

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...
Post a Comment
Read more

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...
Post a Comment
Read more