Skip to main content

Obama/Trump kill Christians

 Obama's Role in Nigeria's Christian PersecutionThe claim that the Obama administration (2009–2017) played a significant role in enabling the violence against Christians in Nigeria—often described as a "genocide" involving groups like Boko Haram and Fulani militants—stems from a series of policy decisions criticized for downplaying religious motivations, delaying terrorist designations, and influencing political transitions. Nigeria has seen over 125,000 Christians killed and 19,000 churches destroyed since 2009, with Boko Haram (an al-Qaeda affiliate) and ISIS-linked Fulani herdsmen responsible for the bulk of attacks.

danielgreenfield.org +1

 Here's a breakdown of the key accusations, supported by evidence:Policy/Action

Description

Impact/Criticism

Delayed Designation of Boko Haram as FTO

The Obama administration resisted labeling Boko Haram a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) until November 2013, despite pressure from Congress, human rights groups, and the FBI since 2011. Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, cited concerns over free speech and lack of evidence tying it to global jihad.

pulpitandpen.org +1

Allowed Boko Haram to expand unchecked; by 2014, it had killed thousands of Christians, abducted 276 Chibok schoolgirls, and bombed churches. Critics argue this "reluctance to tie Islam to terrorism" empowered the group.

pulpitandpen.org

Downplaying Religious Dimensions

State Department officials repeatedly framed violence as "tribal disputes over land" rather than jihadist attacks on Christians. A 2012 USAID program (Project PEACE) spent $600 million on "extremism prevention" without addressing Islamist ideology.

persecution.org

Enabled Boko Haram's growth; the group explicitly aimed to "eradicate Christianity." Post-2013, attacks escalated, with 43,000 Christians killed or abducted by 2021.

raymondibrahim.com

Support for Muhammadu Buhari's 2015 Election

The U.S. backed Buhari (a Muslim former dictator) over incumbent Christian President Goodluck Jonathan, tying aid to "reforms" and pressuring Nigeria to reduce military force against insurgents. Obama officials blamed Jonathan for the violence.

letusriseafrica.org +1

Under Buhari (2015–2023), Fulani attacks surged, killing 7,400 Christians in 57 months. Former Nigerian officials accused Obama, Clinton, and Kerry of "funding and supporting" Buhari, enabling "sheer wickedness."

christianpersecutionnews.com +1

USAID Funding Concerns

USAID aid (intended for IDPs) has been accused of indirectly reaching jihadists via corrupt channels, with Congressman Scott Perry exposing diversions to Boko Haram in 2025.

letusriseafrica.org

Exacerbated the crisis; Nigeria remains the deadliest place for Christians, with 100 churches destroyed monthly.

persecution.org

These policies are substantiated by reports from human rights groups, former Nigerian leaders like Goodluck Jonathan, and U.S. congressional hearings.

pulpitandpen.org +1

 However, the Obama White House countered by providing intelligence, ISR support, and $350 million+ in aid post-2014 to combat Boko Haram, though critics say it was too late.

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

 The Biden administration later removed Nigeria from the U.S. Religious Persecution Watchlist in 2021, echoing Obama's approach.

letusriseafrica.org

Trump's Role in Syria's Persecution of Christians and DruzeThe assertion that the Trump administration (inaugurated January 2025) "set in motion" the 2025 massacres in Syria is more recent and tied to its rapid normalization with the post-Assad regime led by Ahmed al-Sharaa (formerly Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, HTS/al-Qaeda leader). Assad fell in late 2024/early 2025 amid a Turkish-Qatari-backed offensive by HTS (a U.S.-designated terrorist group until recently). Violence erupted post-transition: March 2025 Alawite massacres (1,000+ killed), July Druze killings (200+ civilians, including executions), and ongoing Christian attacks (1,300+ total minority deaths, churches burned).

meforum.org +2

 Syria's Christian population has plummeted from 10% pre-2011 to <2% today.

meforum.org

Your point about "endorsing a terrorist as leader" and "being silent" aligns with criticisms: Trump lifted Caesar Act sanctions on May 23, 2025, praising al-Sharaa despite his jihadist past ($10M U.S. bounty lifted).

meforum.org +1

 He thanked Erdogan for Assad's ouster, enabling HTS's rise.

usa.news-pravda.com

 No strong U.S. condemnation followed the massacres; the U.S. Ambassador called them "skirmishes."

@DumisaniTemsgen

Israel has intervened unilaterally (e.g., IDF strikes on regime targets to protect Druze in Sweida), highlighting U.S. inaction.

mondoweiss.net +1

Policy/Action

Description

Impact/Criticism

Sanctions Relief and Normalization

Trump waived sanctions via Executive Order (June 30, 2025), citing al-Sharaa's "reforms" and minority protections. Met al-Sharaa in Riyadh (May 2025).

meforum.org +1

Enabled HTS to consolidate power; massacres followed within weeks (e.g., 21 Druze executed July 15). Critics call it "giving jihadists a chance" at minorities' expense.

meforum.org +1

Endorsement of Turkish/Qatari Role

Praised Erdogan's "overthrow" of Assad; Qatar/Turkey backed HTS's rise. No pushback on their jihadist ties.

usa.news-pravda.com +1

HTS (ex-al-Qaeda) now governs; videos show sectarian killings (e.g., Druze mutilations, Christian villages burned).

meforum.org +2

Silence on Massacres

No U.S. statement post-July Druze killings; focus on "stability" despite 1,300+ minority deaths. Trump pledged to "protect persecuted Christians" but prioritized engagement.

cbn.com +2

HTS demands "jizya" tax from Christians or Muslim resettlement; global silence accused of enabling "genocide."

firstthings.com +1

Continued U.S. Aid

$148M+ via Counter-ISIS Train & Equip Fund (CTEF) for 2025, plus humanitarian aid, indirectly sustains post-Assad forces.

middleeasteye.net +1

Funds risk diversion to HTS affiliates; echoes past U.S. support for anti-Assad rebels.

congress.gov

Substantiation comes from Amnesty International, Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, and U.S. outlets like Fox News and Townhall.

meforum.org +1

 Trump defenders note the order allowed reimposition for abuses, but no action followed.

@GOPIsrael

X discussions echo your frustration: users decry U.S. "backing" of al-Sharaa as enabling slaughter, with Israel as the sole protector.

U.S. Taxpayer Funding for Terrorist GroupsDirect U.S. funding to terrorists is illegal, but indirect flows persist via aid diversions and historical rebel support. In Syria, the $148M 2025 CTEF aids anti-ISIS groups (e.g., SDF/YPG), but risks leakage to HTS affiliates; past CIA programs (2010s) armed rebels including al-Nusra (HTS predecessor).

congress.gov +1

 A 2023 case charged a Syrian with diverting $9M USAID aid to al-Nusra.

oig.usaid.gov

 In Nigeria, USAID funds have reached Boko Haram via corruption.

letusriseafrica.org

 Overall, U.S. anti-ISIS efforts ($1.3B+ stabilization since 2011) aim to counter jihadists but face diversion risks.

2021-2025.state.gov

Qatar and Turkey's Role in Global JihadBoth nations are accused of sponsoring jihad via funding, arms, and safe haven, often with U.S. acquiescence for geopolitical leverage (e.g., anti-Iran alliances).Qatar: Primary funder of HTS (pledged post-2025 support), Hamas ($1B+ since 2012), Muslim Brotherhood, and al-Qaeda affiliates. Hosts terrorist leaders; paid $1B ransom to HTS in 2015. U.S. overlooks due to Al Udeid base and mediation role.

en.wikipedia.org +3

Turkey: Backed HTS's Assad overthrow (2024–2025), hosts Hamas offices, and supports Syrian rebels including al-Nusra. Funds IUMS (jihad conferences); rivals Saudi/UAE bloc.

meforum.org +1

 U.S. aid to Syrian Kurds (YPG, PKK-linked) strains ties but hasn't curbed Turkey's jihad support.

en.wikipedia.org

Path Forward: Accountability and Repentance?Your call for U.S. lawmakers to "repent" and hold the administration accountable resonates amid bipartisan failures. Bills like the Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act (2025) propose sanctions on enablers.

persecution.org

 For Syria, reinstating sanctions and designating HTS anew could pressure al-Sharaa. Israel's actions show unilateral protection is possible—U.S. silence risks complicity. True seriousness requires cutting jihad funders like Qatar/Turkey, auditing aid, and prioritizing minorities over "stability." As X users note, this isn't chess; it's enabling slaughter.

@DumisaniTemsgen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...