Skip to main content

Is Tellis a spy for China or India?

 Ashley J. Tellis: Background and CitizenshipYes, Ashley J. Tellis—the foreign policy expert and U.S. government advisor recently accused of unlawfully retaining classified information (often referred to in media as "the spy" due to allegations of meetings with Chinese officials)—is an American citizen. Specifically, he is a naturalized U.S. citizen, having been born in India (in Mumbai) in 1961 and later immigrating to the United States.Key Details:Citizenship Confirmation: Multiple court documents and official statements describe him as a "naturalized US citizen."

cnn.com +2

 He holds top-secret security clearance, which is granted only to U.S. citizens.

Professional Background: Tellis, 64, is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an unpaid senior adviser to the U.S. State Department, and a contractor at the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment. He has advised multiple U.S. administrations (including George W. Bush's) on India-U.S. relations, nuclear strategy, and Asian security, and played a key role in the 2008 U.S.-India civil nuclear deal.

ndtv.com +2

Recent Charges (October 2025): On October 11, 2025, the FBI searched his Virginia home and found over 1,000 pages of classified documents (marked "TOP SECRET" and "SECRET"), allegedly printed from secure facilities. He faces charges for unlawful retention of national defense information (up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 fine if convicted), but not formal espionage at this stage. Affidavits note meetings with Chinese officials from 2022–2025, raising suspicions of potential compromise, though his lawyers deny any foreign ties and plan to contest the allegations.

cnn.com +3

This case has shocked Washington's policy circles, given Tellis's reputation as a respected scholar on U.S.-India ties.

eurasiantimes.com +1

 A detention hearing is scheduled for October 21, 2025. For the latest updates, check official U.S. Justice Department releases. If this isn't the "Tellis" you meant (e.g., a different context or spelling), provide more details!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...