Skip to main content

China/rare earth

 China's Recent Moves on Rare Earths and Trade RestrictionsChina, which dominates about 70% of global rare earth mining and 90% of processing, announced sweeping new export controls on October 9, 2025, via its Ministry of Commerce's Announcement No. 61. This escalates from an April 2025 restriction on seven elements (samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium) to now cover 12 out of 17 rare earths by adding five more: holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, and ytterbium. The rules also target related magnets, extraction/separation technologies, and even foreign products containing as little as 0.1% Chinese-sourced rare earths or made with Chinese tech.These aren't outright bans but require export licenses, which China has signaled it will deny "in principle" for military/defense uses or scrutinize heavily for advanced semiconductors and AI applications. The controls take effect December 1, 2025, but some (like tech exports) are immediate. Beijing frames this as protecting "national security" from foreign military misuse, but it's widely seen as economic leverage in the ongoing U.S.-China trade spat.This builds on a pattern: China first weaponized rare earths in 2010 against Japan, then tightened controls in 2023-2024 on items like gallium and graphite amid U.S. chip curbs. The April 2025 move followed Trump's initial tariff hikes, causing global shortages that halted auto production lines.Is This in Response to the Israel Ceasefire?No direct link here. The Israel-Iran ceasefire (a short 12-day conflict ending in July 2025) drew standard Chinese diplomacy: Beijing condemned Israel's strikes, called for de-escalation via the UN, and offered mediation, but its influence was limited without deep regional leverage. China has criticized Israel's Gaza operations and U.S. vetoes of UN resolutions, but the rare earth announcement aligns with trade timelines, not Middle East events. No sources tie the two—it's a U.S.-centric escalation.Fear of U.S. Getting Too Powerful?Absolutely a factor, but more about immediate trade power dynamics than abstract "fear." China views U.S. dominance in tech (e.g., AI chips, software) as a threat to its ambitions, so it mirrors Washington's "foreign direct product rule" by extraterritorially controlling downstream uses of its materials. Analysts call it Beijing "strengthening its bargaining position" ahead of Trump's planned late-October meeting with Xi Jinping in South Korea (APEC summit). It's retaliation for Trump's April tariffs (up to 145% on Chinese goods, later paused at 10-30% via truces) and U.S. export bans on semiconductors/AI tech. Broader context: China worries about U.S. "de-risking" supply chains (e.g., DOD's $400M investment in MP Materials for domestic rare earths), but this move asserts monopoly power to extract concessions like tariff rollbacks or relaxed chip controls.Is This the Reason for the Dow Drop?Yes, directly. On October 10, 2025, the Dow plunged 878 points (1.9%) to 45,479, the S&P 500 fell 2.7% (worst day since April), and Nasdaq dropped 3.6%—erasing $1.56T in S&P value. Markets flipped from early gains (Nasdaq hit a record) after Trump's Truth Social posts: He called China's curbs a "sinister and hostile move," threatened 100% tariffs on all Chinese imports "over and above" existing ones starting November 1 (or sooner), and hinted at canceling the Xi meeting. Tech/AI stocks (e.g., Nvidia, AMD) tanked hardest due to rare earth reliance for chips. This reignited "Liberation Day" tariff fears from April's 9% Dow crash. Other drags: weak Michigan sentiment (55.0, near historic lows) and government shutdown noise, but trade war panic dominated.Index

Close (Oct 10, 2025)

Daily Change

Weekly Change

Dow Jones

45,479.60

-878 pts (-1.9%)

-2.1%

S&P 500

6,552.51

-182 pts (-2.7%)

-1.8%

Nasdaq

22,204.43

-820 pts (-3.6%)

-2.4%

Bottom line: This is classic tit-for-tat in a fragile truce—China flexing its supply chain ace to counter U.S. tariffs, with markets betting on escalation unless the Trump-Xi summit salvages a deal. U.S. diversification (e.g., Lynas, MP Materials) is ramping but years from self-sufficiency. If you're eyeing investments, watch rare earth miners like MP (up 20% in April on shortages) or tariff-sensitive tech.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...
Post a Comment
Read more

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...
Post a Comment
Read more

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...
Post a Comment
Read more