Skip to main content

Black Scottish Kings? Here's reality

 The Stewart (Stuart) Dynasty: Scottish Kings and Their Union with EnglandThe House of Stewart (often spelled Stuart after their time in England) was a Scottish royal dynasty that ruled Scotland from 1371 to 1714. They originated from Walter fitz Alan, the 6th High Steward of Scotland (d. 1326), who married Marjorie Bruce, daughter of King Robert the Bruce. The first Stewart monarch was Robert II (r. 1371–1390). The dynasty's most notable achievement was the Union of the Crowns in 1603, when James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne as James I, uniting the two kingdoms under one monarch—though Scotland and England remained legally separate until the 1707 Acts of Union.The Stewarts were not "kings of England" until James VI/I; prior to that, they were exclusively Scottish monarchs. They faced frequent internal strife, including minority reigns, clan rivalries, and wars with England. The dynasty ended with the death of Queen Anne in 1714, after which the Hanoverians ascended.Regarding your specific phrasing—"black Scottish Stewart Kings of England"—this appears to reference a fringe historical theory (popularized in some Afrocentric narratives and social media) claiming that certain Stewart monarchs, like James VI/I, were of sub-Saharan African descent. This theory often cites selective portraits, alleged "Moorish" influences, or reinterpretations of terms like "black" (which historically could mean dark-haired, swarthy, or metaphorically "dark" in character). However, this is not supported by mainstream historiography, genetic studies, or contemporary accounts. The Stewarts were of Norman-Scottish origin with European lineage, as confirmed by royal genealogies, DNA analyses of related lines, and period descriptions. For example:James VI/I is described in sources like the Scotichronicon and English diplomatic reports as having a "ruddy" or fair complexion.

Claims of "black heirs" undoing "genetic whitewashing" stem from unverified blogs and lack primary evidence.

thepatriot.co.zw

Below, I'll outline key Stewart kings, focusing on those named James (as you mentioned), their reigns, and connections to England. I've used a table for clarity.King

Reign in Scotland

Key Events & Legacy

Connection to England

Notes on "Black" Claims

James I

1406–1437

Captured by English at age 11 en route to France; ransomed after 18 years. Reformed Scottish law, suppressed rival clans (e.g., Albany Stewarts). Assassinated in Perth. Patron of poetry and music.

Fought for England in France; married Joan Beaufort (English noble). His policies strengthened Anglo-Scottish ties but also fueled resentment.

No contemporary evidence of African descent; described as athletic with European features. Fringe claims ignore his Bruce lineage.

James II

1437–1460

Crowned at age 6; known as "Fiery Face" for a red birthmark. Destroyed the Black Douglas clan at the "Black Dinner" (1440). Died in a cannon explosion at Roxburgh siege.

Allied against England early but sought peace; married Mary of Guelders (Dutch). Promoted artillery from Flanders.

"Black" here refers to the "Black Dinner" event or "Black Knight" relatives—not race. Nickname unrelated to complexion.

James III

1460–1488

Minority reign amid noble revolts; arts patron but militarily weak. Killed at Sauchieburn battle.

Married Margaret of Denmark; ceded Orkney to Scotland as dowry. Tense relations with Edward IV of England.

Portraits show typical pale Scottish features; no racial claims in sources.

James IV

1488–1513

Renaissance king; built naval fleet, patronized science (e.g., James IV's Astrologer-Royal). Died at Flodden against England. Married Margaret Tudor ("Thistle and Rose" union).

Invaded England in 1495–1496; his Tudor marriage paved the way for Stuart claim to English throne.

Contemporary accounts note his red hair; X discussions affirm no African presence in 16th-century Scotland beyond rare retinue members.

@aware_wanderer

James V

1513–1542

Minority under regents; toured borders in disguise as "Gudeman of Ballengeich." Died after Solway Moss defeat. Father of Mary, Queen of Scots.

Married Madeleine of Valois (French) and Mary of Guise; raided England, leading to "Rough Wooing."

Described as short and stout with fair skin; no fringe support here.

James VI (James I of England)

Scotland: 1567–1625

England: 1603–1625

Son of Mary, Queen of Scots; crowned infant after her abdication. Escaped plots; authored Daemonologie. United crowns peacefully; sponsored King James Bible. Died of illness.

Inherited from Elizabeth I (Tudor childless); based in England post-1603. Promoted absolutism, clashing with Parliament. Visited Scotland once (1617).

Central to "black king" myths (e.g., alleged Moorish ancestry via Mary).

@ZuluX11

But portraits (e.g., by Paul van Somer) and genetics show European traits. X posts mock or debunk this, e.g., "King James I was White."

@SerenaJB3

Contemporaries noted his scholarly, non-martial demeanor.

Broader Context and LegacyScottish Focus: Most Stewarts ruled Scotland amid feudal chaos, building central authority (e.g., James I's parliaments). They were Catholic until the Reformation; James VI navigated Protestant alliances.

English Union: Only James VI/I and descendants (Charles I, Charles II, James VII/II, William III/Mary II, Anne) ruled both. James VII/II (1685–1688) was deposed in the Glorious Revolution partly over Catholic fears.

On X (Formerly Twitter): Recent discussions (as of Oct 2025) treat "black Stewart" claims as memes or conspiracy fodder. Posts reference Roman-era Africans in Britain but affirm no royal descent; one notes high-status Black courtiers under James IV, not kings.

@aware_wanderer

Debates often tie to modern identity politics or Scottish independence.

@The_Mighty_S

If you're drawing from specific sources (e.g., books like The Blackamoor Kings or X threads), share more details for deeper dives. For factual genealogy, sites like FamilySearch trace Stewarts to clear European roots.

ancestors.familysearch.org

 What aspect intrigues you most—genealogy, myths, or reigns?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tucker anti western propoganda

 Tucker's Qatar Claim: Fact-Checking the "Zero Rapes" MythTucker Carlson recently claimed on his podcast (August 2025) that Qatar has "zero rapes" under Sharia law, using it to argue that Islamic legal systems outperform Western democracies in maintaining order. During an interview with Seth Harp, he praised Sharia for low reported crime, low abortion rates, and no same-sex marriage—positioning it as a model for conservatives frustrated with American liberalism.This is propaganda wrapped in contrarianism—cherry-picked stats that ignore harsh realities. Here’s the breakdown:The Claim's Flaw: "Zero Rapes" Isn't Safety—It's SuppressionOfficial stats vs. reality: Qatar reports near-zero rapes because Sharia-based laws make reporting dangerous for victims. Rape requires four male Muslim witnesses (or a confession), or it's treated as zina (adultery/fornication). Women who report assault often face imprisonment, flogging, or worse for "e...

Qatar Anti-Anerican funding

  Qatar's Spending Overview Qatar, a major Gulf state with significant oil and gas revenues, channels funds through government entities like the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Qatar Foundation, and state-linked charities (e.g., Qatar Charity). These often support humanitarian, educational, and political goals but have drawn criticism for advancing Qatari foreign policy interests, including ties to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Below, I break down spending in the requested categories based on public reports, FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings, U.S. Department of Education disclosures, and analyses from think tanks like ISGAP and the Middle East Forum. Figures are approximate and cumulative where specified; recent years (2023–2025) show acceleration amid the Israel-Hamas conflict. 1. Funding to American Colleges Qatar is the largest foreign donor to U.S. higher education, primarily via the Qatar Foundation (a state-controlled entity) for branc...

EU and X

 LEFT WING RESEARCHERS WANT TO LIMIT RIGHT WING DIALOGE! The EU's DSA requirement for researcher data access (Article 40) gives "vetted" researchers—typically academics or non-profits approved by national regulators—easier access to public X data like post engagement, views, and networks. The official goal is studying "systemic risks" (e.g., disinformation spread). Critics argue this can chill or deter honest/open dialogue in these ways:Broad and subjective labeling of "disinformation" or "harmful" speech: Researchers studying political topics can flag dissenting or unpopular views (e.g., on immigration, elections, gender issues, or COVID policies) as "misinformation" if they don't align with mainstream narratives, leading to reports that pressure platforms or governments to suppress them. Doxxing and harassment risks: Detailed data (e.g., who engages with controversial posts) can reveal user networks or identities, even if post...